The world economy is a complex system which is difficult to predict and thus hard to control. Governments have many forms of trying to control trade such as tariffs, quotas (and zero-quotas or bans), subsidies and fixing exchange rates. They can also create extreme technical or health standards for imports or even transportation. These measures are in place to limit the reliance on other countries as well as a fear of losing the agricultural industry in developed countries which would put them at a military disadvantage. Thought no countries have truly free trade, it would be to everyones benefit to do so. If every nation had completely free trade they would maximize comparative and absolute advantages as well as efficiency by specializing completely. There would be a risk as each country would be entirely dependent on other for products as well as being very susceptible to the market fluctuations of their own product. However protectionism has an even higher cost as the consumer is always at a lesser advantage. In a free market economy, the consumer would have increased buying power after the destruction of other industries and the creation of the specialized industry. Ultimately the entire world economy would benefit as would the world populations since products would be as cheap as possible. However the fear of dependency as well as the social cost of cutting jobs to create specialization prevent this from happening despite the positives.
The perfect example of how protectionism can ruin an economy comes from Argentina. They have rampant tariffs, placed hundreds of products on waiting lists where they must wait for up to 60 days before entering the country, manipulated the exchange rates and imposing trade licenses to over 600 industries who wish to bring products in. Argentina has clamped down on its borders to attempt to jump start its domestic production. The result has been devastating as the economy has plummeted and even worse the rest of the world has turned their backs on them, including a recent ruling by the WTO that these sanctions breach global trade rules. While Argentina will dispute these charges, it is without a doubt that they have ultimately failed and their protectionism has done much more harm than good. While other factors have contributed, the facts remain that Argentina has imploded its own economy and now has no one to turn to for help. They have defaulted on their debt and investors have lost faith in the once powerful and rich nation. We should learn from their mistakes and move away from the potential harms of protectionism and open the borders to free trade for the benefit of all.
Sources:
Lecture slides
http://www.internationalfinancemagazine.com/article/WTO-rules-against-Argentinas-protectionism.html
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-risks-and-rewards-of-argentinas-growing-protectionism/
So if your argument is that overall protectionism is beneficial, how would you answer the domestic cost of "losers" from free trade? Should the welfare state be expanded? Should free trade just be allowed to continue, and hopefully it will straighten itself out quickly?
ReplyDeleteThe main blockade here is the fear of dependency. Countries hate to be dependent on each other for fear of losing what they're getting in times of war or conflict. I wish we could have truly free trade for everyone, but I just can't see it happening anytime soon. World leaders are more and more paranoid by the minute, and there seems to be a lot less trust in the world system.
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting idea to consider. While it does seem that free trade would be beneficial for all, I think the idea all together seems to ideal. Our global system functions in such a way where tariffs, quotas and rates are necessary in order to keep global economies up. The global trade system is in a sense held together with these taxes, and if they were taken away I fear the system would become very disorganized.
ReplyDeleteFree trade is the most ideal situation for our world economy, but I agree with Lauren that our world system doesn't necessarily function that way. Countries have used tariffs and trade/ economic sanctions to protest against states internal decisions. The United states has used this before and it creates a more civilized attack on countries instead of engaging in physical war. So being able to use these tools is necessary in order for nations to maintain power and our competitive global trade system.
ReplyDelete